Monkeybone (2001) 🙊🙈🙉
Did I watch this? I don’t think I did.
—
Let’s start by showing y’all the trailers shall we?
And right away you can tell something is… off.
Like not just “weird movie” off.
I mean:
> “This feels like three different movies fighting each other for control.”
—
🧾 Non-Spoiler Plot Overview
We follow Stu Miley (Brendan Fraser), a cartoonist who creates a character called Monkeybone and gets the opportunity of a lifetime:
His work is being adapted into a TV series.
That’s the dream.
That’s the goal.
That’s what every artist wants.
…and his reaction is basically:
> “Ugh… this is a lot.”
EXCUSE ME???
You mean the thing people spend YEARS trying to achieve??
And you’re acting like someone just handed you extra homework??
—
🎭 Character Rundown
Stu Miley (Brendan Fraser)
Look—I like Brendan Fraser.
But this character?
Insufferable.
You’re telling me this man:
gets his art picked up
gets a full production deal
is about to have his life changed
…and he reacts like:
> “Wow… what a burden.”
Dude.
There are starving artists everywhere watching this like:
> “I will TAKE THAT BURDEN OFF YOUR HANDS.”
And then there’s his pilot episode…
Oh my God.
This is where the movie just goes off the rails early.
Because instead of something clever, funny, or creative…
It feels like:
> some weird fetish fever dream.
Like genuinely—watching it, you’re just sitting there thinking:
> “THIS is what got greenlit???”
—
Monkeybone (voiced by John Turturro) (voiced/performed through chaos)
This character is supposed to be:
edgy
chaotic
funny
Instead, he’s just:
> annoying chaos in monkey form.
He’s not clever chaos.
He’s just:
> “LOOK HOW RANDOM I AM!”
—
Supporting Cast
You’ve got:
Bridget Fonda trying to ground this insanity
Chris Kattan doing… whatever this performance is
And everyone feels like they’re in completely different movies.
—
⏱️ Pacing / Episode Flow
This movie doesn’t have pacing.
It has:
> tonal whiplash.
One minute it’s:
dark fantasy
Next minute:
gross-out comedy
Then suddenly:
weird romance
Then:
existential afterlife stuff
Pick. A. Lane.
PLEASE.
—
✅ Pros
The stop-motion / practical creature designs are actually cool
Some of the visuals are genuinely creative
There’s potential buried somewhere in here
—
❌ Cons
Stu is unbelievably entitled
I cannot get over this.
This man achieves the dream and reacts like it’s a chore.
That alone makes him hard to root for.
—
The tone is a complete mess
Is this:
a dark fantasy?
a comedy?
a romance?
a gross-out cartoon adaptation?
The movie doesn’t know.
So it tries to be all of them.
And fails at all of them.
—
The humor doesn’t land
It’s either:
too weird
too gross
or just… not funny
—
The story is all over the place
Nothing flows.
Nothing builds.
Everything just… happens.
—
The pilot episode is baffling
Again…
> THIS is what got picked up??
It feels less like a show and more like:
> someone’s unfiltered intrusive thoughts animated.
—
🎬 Final Thoughts
This movie feels like:
> a talented director’s vision
smashed together with studio interference
and then edited by chaos itself.
Because there ARE glimpses of something interesting here.
But they’re buried under:
bad writing
tonal confusion
and just… baffling decisions
—
⭐ Rating
2/10
(Not a full zero only because the visuals are trying to carry this entire movie on their back.)
—
⚠️ Spoiler Warning
Alright…
now we descend into madness.
—
🚨 Spoilers (Full Rant Mode)
So Stu gets into an accident and ends up in this afterlife world called Downtown.
And this is where the movie SHOULD get interesting.
Instead?
It gets confusing.
FAST.
—
You’ve got:
nightmare creatures
bizarre rules
random characters popping in and out
And none of it is clearly explained.
It’s just:
> “Go with it.”
NO.
I would like to understand what is happening, please.
—
Then Monkeybone takes over Stu’s body in the real world…
…and the movie turns into:
> “What if chaos possessed a human being?”
Which sounds fun.
But again—it’s not controlled chaos.
It’s just:
> noise.
—
Meanwhile, Stu is trying to get back to his body, there’s romance stakes, afterlife rules, weird dream mechanics…
And it all just becomes:
> a mess.
—
And then the ending…
OH MY GOD the ending.
This is where you just sit there like:
> “…what?”
Things just:
resolve suddenly
characters switch motivations
logic completely disappears
And by the time it’s over, you’re not satisfied.
You’re not even mad.
You’re just sitting there slowly clapping like:
> “What the f*** did I just watch.”
—
And that’s the lasting feeling.
Not:
> “That was good”
or
“That was bad”
But:
> “That was… something.”
—
🧠 Final Final Thought
This isn’t just a bad movie.
This is a confusing experience.
One that makes you question:
the script
the tone
the decisions
and your own sanity
And honestly?
That might be the most memorable thing about it.
