The Bride of Frankenstein (1935)

⚡️ The Bride of Frankenstein (1935) ⚡️

“Till Death Do Us Part… or Until Universal Needs a Sequel”




🎬 Let’s start with the trailers, shall we?

Since this is a Universal film, Y’all know what that means? Cue the Universal Logo!






📝 Non-Spoiler Thoughts

Here’s the thing: I finally sat down with The Bride of Frankenstein, and while I get why people call it a “classic,” I couldn’t help feeling torn between admiration and frustration. Yes, James Whale injected style and gothic flair into every corner, and yes, it’s leagues more confident than the 1931 original. But does it actually respect Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein? Not really.

Instead, it leans into pulp melodrama, adding in campy humor and bizarre side characters. Worst offender? De Lacy. In Shelley’s book, De Lacy is the one humanizing thread for the monster — a blind man who treats him with compassion. In this film? He’s reduced to a gag: teaching the monster how to smoke a cigar like some back-alley uncle. Ha-ha, the monster is smoking. Very funny. Except it’s not. It’s a disgrace to one of the most pivotal, nuanced parts of the novel.

And let’s shut down one myth while we’re at it: people love to say, “Oh, De Lacy’s been done so many times.” Nope. Wrong. This was basically his only real depiction on screen until Guillermo del Toro’s upcoming Frankenstein finally promises to give the character his proper due. We’ve never had a faithful version of him — only this embarrassing comic relief.

Now, the “Bride” angle at least comes from Shelley’s book — in the novel, the creature demands that Victor make him a companion. Of course, the film changes nearly everything about that setup, but credit where it’s due: the core idea isn’t totally out of nowhere.




🎭 Character Rundown

The Monster (Boris Karloff)
Karloff brings genuine pathos. He’s lumbering and tragic, but the script makes him sillier this time around, especially with the De Lacy nonsense. Karloff himself wasn’t even thrilled about the talking sequences.

Henry Frankenstein (Colin Clive)
Back again, this time more hysterical, more tortured. He swings between wanting to escape the madness and being pulled back into it.

Elizabeth Lavenza (Valerie Hobson)
Henry’s fiancée/wife, mostly stuck in damsel mode, wringing hands and delivering the standard “Henry, you must stop!” lines.

Dr. Pretorius (Ernest Thesiger)
The real MVP of this film’s absurdity. Campy, flamboyant, and cartoonishly evil. He basically shows up, says “let’s make monsters together,” and has the most fun out of anyone.

The Bride (Elsa Lanchester)
Let’s be honest: iconic hair, iconic hiss, maybe five minutes of screentime. She’s barely in the movie, but her design became horror legend.





👍 Pros

The gothic atmosphere is beautiful, and Whale’s direction is confident. Karloff still sells the creature’s loneliness. Pretorius adds a wild energy that gives the movie a different flavor from its predecessor. And visually? Some of the sets and effects still impress nearly a century later.




👎 Cons

Faithful to Shelley? Forget it. De Lacy’s insulting treatment undercuts the novel’s most poignant subplot. The “Bride” barely exists — she’s more marketing than character. The humor undercuts the tragedy, and the pacing stumbles under the weight of melodrama. And yeah, the monster smoking a cigar? That hasn’t aged well.




🏁 Final Thoughts & Rating

At the end of the day, The Bride of Frankenstein is a fascinating piece of horror history but a deeply unfaithful Frankenstein story. It’s campy, uneven, and more about spectacle than Shelley’s themes of responsibility, creation, and loneliness. I admire parts of it but don’t love it. It’s far from the definitive take on the novel — honestly, we still don’t have one.

Rating: 6/10




⚠️ Spoiler Talk Ahead! ⚠️

The movie opens with Mary Shelley herself (played by Elsa Lanchester, who doubles as the Bride) being told her tale wasn’t finished — a cheeky meta nod. From there, we pick up with Henry Frankenstein alive and reluctantly pulled back into experiments by Dr. Pretorius. Pretorius is basically the devil on his shoulder, pushing him to “play God” again.

Meanwhile, the monster wanders, kills, and yes, stumbles into De Lacy’s cabin. This is the infamous scene where the blind hermit teaches him to smoke, drink, and enjoy the good life. What should’ve been a touching lesson in humanity turns into a Saturday Night Live sketch. For a story that’s supposed to be about the tragedy of existence, this feels tone-deaf.

Eventually, Pretorius blackmails Henry into creating a female companion. Thus, the “Bride” is born — towering hair streaked with lightning, hissing like a cat. She sees the monster, screams, and rejects him immediately. Devastated, the monster delivers the immortal line: “We belong dead.” He pulls the lever, destroying the lab and (supposedly) himself, the Bride, and Pretorius in a blaze of fire.

It’s dramatic, sure, but it also leaves you feeling cheated — the Bride barely mattered, De Lacy was wasted, and Henry just survives again to repeat the same cycle.

Leave a comment