🧟‍♂️ Overlord (2018) 🧟‍♀️

💀 Nazis, the occult, and the undead — WWII reimagined as a horror nightmare 💀


—

🎥 Let’s start by showing y’all the trailers, shall we?

Official Trailer – Overlord (2018)

Trailer Talk: Hells Bells and Nazi Hell

If there’s one trailer that stuck in my head before walking into Overlord, it was this one. The second AC/DC’s “Hells Bells” drops in, the whole thing transforms from generic WWII footage into pure pulp madness. The tolling bell over paratroopers dropping from the sky, the guitar riff kicking in just as the Nazi experiments start flashing on screen — goosebumps.

And the best part? The movie actually delivers on that exact energy. It’s gritty war chaos colliding with bonkers horror in a way that feels like you’re watching a live-action grindhouse comic book. Too often, trailers oversell and the movie fizzles (cough so many blockbusters), but Overlord matched its marketing beat for beat. The trailer promised Nazi zombies and chaos with AC/DC swagger — and the film gave me exactly that.

⚠️ Content Warning: Overlord leans heavily into body horror, gore, and disturbing imagery. The film features graphic violence, unsettling experiments, and intense wartime brutality. If you’re squeamish about blood, medical horror, or grotesque transformations, this one may push your limits. Proceed with caution. Also it is named after a real world project the Nazis were doing. This is gonns trigger some people unfortunately.

🧟‍♂️ The Title Problem

One of the biggest fumbles here isn’t even in the movie itself — it’s in the title. Naming this film Overlord ties it directly to Operation Overlord, the real-life D-Day invasion. That creates a weird disconnect. The title makes you expect a serious WWII drama, but what you actually get is a grindhouse horror flick with Nazi zombies and a serum of nightmares. On paper, that’s fun — but the branding almost makes it feel like they’re making a farce out of something very real and tragic. It undercuts the tone. If they had gone with a pulpy title like Blood Church or Nazi Zombie Serum, audiences probably would’ve embraced it for what it is instead of scratching their heads. Instead, it roots itself too hard in history while playing out like a gory comic book — which likely hurt its chances at getting the sequel it clearly set up.

🧟‍♂️ Title Explained: Why Overlord?

The film’s title isn’t just random cool-sounding military jargon — it’s rooted in history. Operation Overlord was the real codename for the Allied invasion of Normandy on June 6, 1944 (D-Day). The opening of the movie, with American paratroopers dropping behind enemy lines, is pulled straight from that mission.

But while the setup is historically grounded, the movie twists the meaning. Instead of just being about a pivotal WWII operation, Overlord quickly becomes a pulpy nightmare where Nazi experiments give rise to reanimated corpses and twisted super-soldiers. The name sticks as a reminder of the real-world mission — while the film itself asks: what if D-Day uncovered something far more sinister beneath the battlefields?

It’s a mix of historical weight and B-movie irony, anchoring the outlandish zombie-horror action to an actual point in time. Makes u wonder why JJ Abrams went with the name, did he do it because he thought the name was cool? I can understand why some people side eyed this project, but im not here to talk about that subject or get political im here to reveiw this film for what it is, a film and another zombie related topic

One thing that’s always puzzled me is the title itself. Overlord makes sense if you know your history — Operation Overlord was the codename for the Allied invasion of Normandy, which is where this story kicks off. But once the plot shifts into the Nazi church bunker and the serum horrors, the word “Overlord” never comes up again. The experiments aren’t called “Project Overlord” or anything clever like that — they’re just tied to Hitler’s “Thousand Year Reich.” So while the name fits on paper for the opening setup, it feels strangely disconnected from the movie that follows. It kind of leaves you wondering why they didn’t just give the experiments that title to tie it all together.

Another odd thing about Overlord is how the title kind of puts both audiences into a weird loophole. If you’re a history buff, you hear “Overlord” and immediately think of Operation Overlord, the codename for the Allied invasion of Normandy. So naturally, you walk in expecting a gritty war movie about D-Day. But then halfway through, boom — zombies, secret serums, grotesque experiments. It throws you off balance in a way that feels less like a twist and more like misdirection.

And if you’re just an average moviegoer — someone who doesn’t know what “Overlord” even means historically — you’re just as confused, but for a different reason. You’re sitting there like, “Why is this called Overlord? Is that the name of the serum? The project? The villain?” Nope. The word never even comes up in the film. So in the end, the title works for neither group: historians feel tricked, and normies feel lost.

🧟‍♂️ The Identity Crisis Problem

One of the biggest hurdles with Overlord is that it never quite knew who it was for. The title itself sets up a massive expectation clash. Operation Overlord was the real codename for the D-Day invasion, so history buffs walk in expecting a gritty WWII war drama — only to find “Nazi zombies in a church bunker” and walk out muttering, what the hell did I just watch?

For Jewish audiences or anyone tied personally to the horrors of the Holocaust, the film can feel like it’s trivializing atrocities by turning Nazi experimentation into a pulpy B-movie serum plot. That’s not just confusing — it can come off as tone-deaf.

And then there’s the zombie crowd. The second they hear “Nazi zombies,” most fans instantly think of Call of Duty: Zombies. But this isn’t that. Instead of wave-based survival mayhem, they get a tense war-horror hybrid with a slow-burn setup and grim atmosphere. That leaves them thrown off if they were expecting nonstop undead action.

So what you end up with is a weird Venn diagram where no group leaves fully satisfied. History buffs are baffled, Jewish audiences are offended, zombie purists are disappointed. The only people who really click with it are those willing to take it purely as a grindhouse war-horror experiment — everyone else just sees an identity crisis.
Overlord as a “Plausible Nightmare”

What makes Overlord so effective is that it feels like it could’ve been ripped straight out of a Zombie Army campaign. The mix of WWII grit, Nazi occult experiments, and body horror doesn’t just feel cinematic — it feels disturbingly plausible. Hitler’s real obsession with the occult gives the film’s premise an extra layer of unease, making the scenario feel less like pulp fantasy and more like a twisted “what if” history. It’s not just “what if Nazis made zombies?” — it’s “what if the darkest parts of history were pushed even further?” That’s why the film doesn’t just entertain, it unsettles.

And here’s the part that actually made me sit back and go: “Wait… if Hitler and his merry band of goose-stepping psychos really did cook up some kind of chemical or occult freak show that worked, does that mean he never would’ve surrendered?”

Yeah, chew on that nightmare fuel for a sec. In real life, Hitler went out like a coward—popped himself in a bunker and left the rest of the world to sweep up the ashes. But here? These movies flip that on its head. They basically say: “What if he had one last card up his sleeve? What if he was petty enough, unhinged enough, to actually throw it down just to drag everyone else into hell with him?”

That’s what makes this scarier than just another zombie gorefest. It’s not about some random undead boogeyman—it’s about a plausible nightmare. History already proved the Nazis had no moral floor. None. Zip. They’d try anything, no matter how grotesque. So imagining them pulling this stunt? Horrifyingly believable.

It’s like the movie’s whispering in your ear: “Zombies aren’t real… but if anyone in history was deranged enough to try and make them, it was the Nazis.”

Addressing the “Glorification” Criticism

Some critics weirdly claimed Overlord was guilty of “over-glorifying war and Nazis.” Let me be blunt: that’s nonsense. This film doesn’t glorify Nazis — it turns them into literal monsters. Their experiments aren’t shown as cool or impressive; they’re grotesque, body-horror nightmares that make you want to gag. These Nazis aren’t geniuses to admire, they’re ghouls to fear.

What Overlord actually does is lean into a pulp horror angle: “What if Hitler’s obsession with the occult had worked?” It exaggerates their cruelty into a sci-fi nightmare scenario where even their soldiers are victims, mutilated and warped into inhuman abominations. That’s not respect — that’s vilification cranked to eleven.

The slick action and video-game pacing might trick some people into thinking the film is “stylized” in a celebratory way, but the underlying message is clear: Nazis dehumanized the world, and in this story, they literally dehumanize themselves.

If anything, Overlord glorifies survival against impossible odds — not the villains themselves.

Btw make no mistake this is an B-movie pulpy type film.

🧩 Legacy & Influence: The “Overlord Connection”

It’s hard not to draw a line between Frankenstein’s Army (2013) and Overlord (2018). Both are World War II horror hybrids that toss soldiers into underground Nazi labs filled with grotesque experiments that defy nature. But here’s the kicker — Frankenstein’s Army did it first, five years earlier, and arguably with more imagination.

While Overlord polished the concept into a slick, Hollywood-ready action horror, Frankenstein’s Army was the raw, unfiltered nightmare prototype. The creature designs, industrial gore, and “war meets mad science” tone feel so similar that fans have long speculated Overlord quietly borrowed from it. The difference lies in intent: Frankenstein’s Army was a fever dream of rust and rot — Overlord was a blockbuster remix that replaced grime with gloss.

Either way, both films share the same twisted DNA: war turning men into monsters, and science finishing the job.



—

📖 Non-Spoiler Plot Overview

At first, Overlord feels like a straight war film — paratroopers dropping behind enemy lines on the eve of D-Day, tasked with destroying a Nazi radio tower in a French village. But once the mission begins, the movie tilts into horror.

Boyce, one of the paratroopers, stumbles into a hidden Nazi lab beneath a church and discovers a nightmare: grotesque experiments resurrecting the dead. Soldiers pumped full of a mysterious serum come back… but not as themselves. These aren’t just zombies. They’re twisted, unnatural abominations.

The film nails its bleak tone. It takes itself seriously, never lapsing into parody, and that’s why it works. For the first time in years, zombies felt scary again. And more than that, it plays like a live-action Zombie Army Trilogy. Hitler was obsessed with the occult in real life — so seeing a film take that “what if” seriously makes it uncomfortably believable.

Basically this film feels and looks like a prequel to the games Zombie Army. Mainly fur to the fact both deal with what if Nazis were resurrecting the dead during WW2 secretly.

What really unsettled me about Overlord is that the “zombies” aren’t just random corpses brought back for shock value. The Nazis invaded this French village, stole its citizens, and experimented on them until they became these grotesque, twisted creatures. That’s what makes the horror stick — you’re not fighting nameless ghouls, you’re fighting what’s left of real people who lived in that town. And since the Nazis actually did perform horrifying experiments in real life, the film exaggerates something that’s already rooted in truth. It’s not just body horror, it’s human horror — victims turned into monsters against their will.

Overlord as a “Zombie Army Prequel”

If you’ve ever played the Zombie Army games, Overlord feels eerily like a live-action prequel. The ingredients are all here: Nazis dabbling in occult science, grotesque experiments bringing the dead back in twisted forms, and a ragtag squad of soldiers trying to survive against impossible odds.

The film’s bleak bunkers, jars of preserved horrors, and body-bag monstrosities could be ripped straight from Zombie Army Trilogy or Zombie Army 4. It even shares that same uncomfortable plausibility — since Hitler really was obsessed with occult relics and pseudo-science, the idea of Nazi zombie experiments doesn’t feel completely out of left field.

So while Overlord is its own standalone horror war movie, it doubles as the closest thing we’ve ever gotten to a cinematic Zombie Army adaptation. It’s pulpy, grim, and absurd in all the right ways — the kind of “what if?” scenario that feels like it was begging to be playable.

The Plausibility Factor 🧪🩸

One of the most unsettling strengths of Overlord is how plausible its horror feels. Zombies aren’t real, but the Nazis’ obsession with the occult and their history of grotesque human experimentation gives this film a disturbingly grounded edge. The dank labs, the syringes of glowing serum, the prisoners stitched together into abominations — all of it feels like a nightmarish extension of what could have happened if the Reich had gone even further into their darkest obsessions.

It’s like the film is saying:
“Yeah, zombies aren’t real… but if anyone in history was insane enough to try and make them, it’d be the Nazis.”

That’s what makes Overlord stand apart from most zombie flicks: it doesn’t just throw in monsters for spectacle. It whispers, “What if?” And given the war’s real atrocities, that “what if” hits a little too close to home.



—

👥 Character Rundown

Boyce (Jovan Adepo) – Our wide-eyed but resilient protagonist. Starts nervous, ends up becoming the emotional and moral core.

Ford (Wyatt Russell) – A hardened explosives expert. Pragmatic, cold, but heroic when it matters.

Chloe (Mathilde Ollivier) – A French villager resisting the Nazis while protecting her younger brother. Humanizes the story with her determination and vulnerability.

Tibbet (John Magaro) – The wise-cracking soldier. Provides levity but still feels grounded.

Wafner (Pilou Asbæk) – Sadistic Nazi officer, who becomes something far more monstrous by the end.


The cast works because they feel human. These aren’t caricatures — which makes it sting all the more when they suffer. But who makes it and who doesn’t? That’s for the spoiler section.

These nazis on screen are some of the most vile versions.You’ll ever see.I mean, you have one of them spitting on a kid’s baseball bat, and then austin, it back to him.Like that’s not even necessary or they will also shoot people for fun and have that smug laugh.

Or in the case of our main villain, he’s a sexual assaulter, so come to think of it them making zombies is the least horrible thing.They did in this movie.In fact, they’re saying, it might be the most fascinating thing they do.


—

⏱️ Pacing / Episode Flow

The film is razor-sharp in its escalation:

First act = gritty war survival.

Second act = infiltration and creeping dread as Boyce uncovers the lab.

Third act = all-out chaos, gore, and sacrifice.


It never overstays its welcome and always builds tension toward its horrifying crescendo.


—

✅ Pros

Atmosphere drenched in dread — claustrophobic, grim, and suffocating.

Grotesque practical effects that hit harder than CGI.

Zombies are treated seriously, not as a gag.

Characters are likable, which makes the violence hit harder.

Blends WWII grit and horror seamlessly.

Pro – The Unpredictability Makes It Scarier
While the serum’s logic is messy, that very unpredictability is what makes it unsettling. You don’t know what you’re going to get — a mindless, twisted creature that can’t be stopped, or a calculating, intelligent monster who knows exactly what he’s doing. That duality taps into a primal fear: would you rather face a rabid beast or a sadist with superhuman strength? Either way, you’re screwed.

Pro – Grounded Characterization
The characters in Overlord aren’t overstuffed with quirks or grand speeches — they’re stripped down and simple, which weirdly works. Most of them feel like regular soldiers shoved into an impossible situation, reacting the way actual people might. Even Wyatt Russell’s character, Ford, is basically just “the grumpy hard-edged leader,” a man of few words who runs on instinct and authority. On paper, that sounds thin, but in practice it makes the group dynamic feel authentic. Their plain traits keep the story anchored in realism, which in turn makes the bursts of horror more jarring and believable.

❌️ Con – The Serum Problem
One thing Overlord never makes clear is how exactly this serum is supposed to work. Early on, when the Americans inject their fallen comrade, he snaps back in the most horrific way possible — neck twisted, eyes bleeding, basically a snarling husk with zero humanity left. But when the Nazi commander injects himself (twice), he doesn’t lose his mind at all. Instead, he becomes this grotesque but still self-aware “super-soldier,” capable of giving full villain speeches mid-zombie transformation.

It’s inconsistent — sometimes the serum turns people into brainless monsters, other times it makes them stronger and more sadistic but still coherent. That can feel like sloppy writing… but, at the same time, it weirdly works. The unpredictability keeps the serum scary, because you never know if the next injection will give you a raging abomination or a monster with enough brains left to enjoy torturing you.

Con – Wafner’s Villain Degradation

Wafner starts out as a legitimately terrifying and sadistic presence, and once he takes the serum you’d expect him to become an even more unstoppable nightmare. Instead, the movie weirdly dials him down into this cartoonish, monologuing bad guy. He spends most of the third act choking people, tossing them around, and ranting endlessly instead of actually killing anyone. It’s less “oh god, how do they stop him?” and more “what the hell are you even doing, dude?” The serum should have made him scarier, but instead it turned him into a Saturday morning villain with plot armor for the heroes. Honestly, Wafner would’ve worked so much better if he had gone the opposite route — fewer words, more silent brutality. Let his actions do the talking instead of dragging scenes down with endless monologues.

Bright side, at least he looks horrifying, he has half his face missing because he got shot with a shotgun in the face.

“Of course his name is Professor Schmidt”
Look, I get it — this movie is pulp horror. It’s not going for subtlety, but come on. The evil Nazi doctor running creepy basement experiments just had to be named Professor Schmidt. Of course he is. That’s the most copy-paste villain name you could slap onto a script. It’s basically the cinematic equivalent of naming your evil corporation “Evil Corp.” It’s predictable, it’s bland… but weirdly, it works. Nazis are bland. Nazis are cliché. They’re not interesting — they’re just cruel, boring monsters in real life. So maybe it’s fitting that the mad scientist running the zombie experiments has the most obvious, uninspired name imaginable. Still, I couldn’t help but laugh — like, wow, thanks for the creativity there, guys.

—

💭 Final Thoughts

Overlord is the closest we’ll ever get to a live-action Zombie Army film. It takes the “what if Hitler actually weaponized the occult” idea and makes it terrifyingly plausible. It’s bleak, grotesque, and unapologetic — but that’s its strength.

It may not reinvent zombies forever, but for two hours, it makes them terrifying again. And in the process, it proves that sometimes the scariest “what if” stories are the ones that brush closest to history.

Overall, I find us to be an underrated movie it’s very underappreciated, look, I know.This movie gets a lot of hate and I know it’s gonna get a lot of hate.But if you accepted what it is a grindhouse b zombie movie, then you’re going to enjoy yourself. I had quit fun with this film. This film is first a world war two film. Then, a zombie film, second, and I don’t mind that at all. The slow pacing  actually makes it feel like a genuine horror movie.


—

⭐ Rating: 9/10


—

⚠️ Spoiler Warning

From here on out: major spoilers ahead.


—

🧟 Spoilers

The Most Unsettling Discovery

One of the most disturbing scenes comes when Boyce (Jovan Adepo) is quietly exploring the Nazi church-turned-laboratory. He moves through the shadows, tension rising, until he pulls back a curtain—and freezes. Behind it is not just another experiment, but a severed human head, still alive begging for help in french, grotesquely wired up to tubes and machines. Its spine juts downward from the neck, raw and exposed, twitching as though clinging to life. The eyes roll, the mouth gapes, and it makes faint, guttural noises that are almost worse than screams. It’s a horrifying sight because it’s not a zombie, not a monster—it’s a victim, suffering in limbo, trapped between life and death. This single image lingers far longer than any gunfight or explosion, hammering home just how depraved the Nazis’ experiments really are.

Fine I’ll show the clip, but dont say I didnt warn y’all. Im not responsible if any y’all get nightmares.

🧟‍♀️ How the Film Handles Zombie Screen Time

One thing that sets Overlord apart from most zombie flicks is how sparingly it actually shows its undead. You don’t get hordes swarming every frame—what you get is a handful of moments that land way harder because they’re restrained.

The most chilling by far is when Boyce pulls back a curtain in the lab and finds a decapitated woman’s head with her spine still dangling, hooked up to a fluid bag. She’s still alive, still speaking French, begging for help. It’s horrifying precisely because she shouldn’t be able to.

On a more personal note, Chloe (Mathilde Ollivier) brings back her grandmother after the Nazis experimented on her in the church. To Chloe, she’s just “sick,” but we as the audience know exactly what’s happening. That off-screen horror hits harder because it’s left to implication.

Most of the zombies we do see are behind bars, locked in cells, reduced to guttural moans and desperate clawing. You don’t need to see them rip and tear—the sound design sells the dread.

Then there’s the tar pit sequence, where we discover a well of black fluid with tubes running out of it. Hanging from those tubes are sacks filled with twisted reanimated corpses. They twitch, groan, and hang in limbo like grotesque cocoons. It’s body horror at its peak—just enough shown to make your imagination run wild.


Overlord doesn’t flood the screen with zombies—it lets you marinate in the spaces where they lurk. That’s what makes it stick.


The film wastes no time showing its teeth. When Boyce sneaks into the Nazi church, he discovers the lab — a grotesque nightmare filled with writhing, screaming experiments. People sewn together, organs pulsing in jars, and victims still conscious while being pumped full of serum. One soldier’s body is literally just a head and spinal cord, still alive, begging for death.

The serum resurrects the dead, but at a cost: they return twisted, monstrously strong, and mindless. It’s not “life after death” — it’s weaponized suffering.

One of the film’s most disturbing moments comes when Chloe’s younger brother is locked in the lab as bait. Boyce and Ford fight desperately to save him, while the horror of what’s happening to the other prisoners hangs heavy.

While Chloe escapes with her brother but then they both get corned by a zombie that she has to kill, she tries to kill by emptying three shots through its head. But it does nothing, it just gets back up. So she gets chased down the corridors until she finds a flamethrower and incinerates him.

When Wafner is horribly injured during the infiltration, he takes the serum himself. His transformation is ghastly: bones snapping back into place, veins bulging, skin twisting. He becomes a near-unkillable monster — the embodiment of Nazi cruelty made flesh. His fights with Ford and Boyce are brutal, loud, and sickeningly physical.

Tibbet, the wise-cracker, is gunned down in shocking fashion — no heroic blaze of glory, just sudden, brutal death.

Ford, however, makes the ultimate sacrifice. Injecting himself with the serum to gain enough strength to hold Wafner off, he mutates in front of our eyes. Veins blacken, his body convulses, and he slowly loses himself. Yet he holds on long enough to fight Wafner in the lab’s furnace chamber. The two clash in a grotesque, bloody showdown. Ford, half-monster already, detonates explosives, killing them both and sealing the lab.

The final note is bittersweet. Boyce refuses to use the serum, rejecting its temptation. He seals the lab shut, burying the horrors with it. The radio tower is destroyed, the mission succeeds, but the cost is enormous. There’s no “victory lap” — just survival in the shadow of something unspeakable.

The ending really drives home the horror of what’s been uncovered. After everything, the protagonist makes the choice to bury the truth. When he returns to the command center, his superior asks if there was anything of value inside that church. He pauses, then lies — no, nothing worth reporting. And that’s chilling in its own way. Because he knows the second the military gets wind of what was really down there, they’ll dig it up, weaponize it, and repeat the same nightmare the Nazis started.

It’s one of those endings that sticks with you, because it reframes the entire story. This isn’t just about winning a skirmish in a war. It’s about drawing a line in the sand: some discoveries are too horrific to be passed along. The serum doesn’t belong to one side or another — it’s poison, no matter whose hands it’s in. And sometimes the bravest act isn’t blowing up a lab or gunning down monsters, but refusing to let that evil move forward at all.

Why the Serum Had to Stay Buried

One of the smartest choices Overlord makes is letting Wyatt Russell’s character, Ford, come to the only logical conclusion: this serum can never leave that bunker. Period. It doesn’t matter who controls it — Nazi or Allied — it’s too dangerous.

We’ve already seen what happens when it’s used in small doses: people brought back from the dead who don’t stay down no matter how many bullets you put in their heads, bodies twisting and warping into something inhuman, and victims who lose every trace of their humanity. The only thing that stops them? Fire. And let’s be honest — flamethrowers aren’t exactly standard issue.

If this virus had been mass-produced, the war wouldn’t have just been prolonged, it could have escalated into something apocalyptic. Imagine battlefields crawling with the undead, soldiers rising again and again until the only way to end a fight was to burn everything to ash. The serum promised “a thousand-year Reich,” but what it really would have created was a thousand-year nightmare.

Ford sacrificing himself to keep the serum buried wasn’t just a noble gesture — it was the only real way to stop the war from spilling over into something far worse than humanity could ever control.

Now if u excuse me, im gonna go play some Zombie Army, because that feels like a continuation.