A Ghost Story For Christmas Stigma

🌬️ A Ghost Story for Christmas: Stigma (1977) – Review 🪦🩸

🎞️ Let’s start by showing y’all the trailers, shall we?



⚠️ Content Note

This entry does not adapt an M.R. James story, unlike most of the other Ghost Story for Christmas episodes. Instead, it’s an original tale that leans more into psychic horror than ghostly dread. And it’s… weird.




📖 Non-Spoiler Plot Overview

Set in a quiet English countryside home, Stigma follows Katherine, a modern woman who has just moved in with her husband and son. When construction workers begin digging up part of the ancient stone circle in their yard, something gets… disturbed.

Shortly afterward, Katherine begins experiencing bizarre symptoms — namely, uncontrollable and unexplained bleeding. There are no wounds. No trauma. No logic.

It’s not long before the bleeding intensifies. Whatever was buried beneath their land doesn’t want to be disturbed.




🧍 Character Rundown

Katherine – Our main character, whose slow, painful unraveling drives the horror. She’s not particularly deep, but the actress gives it her all.

Peter (her husband) – Useless. Absolutely no notes. Useless.

Son (Robin) – Honestly forgettable. He’s just kind of there.

The Land / Curse / Vibes – Basically the villain. The house is built on blood and ancient magic. So… good job, real estate agent.





🕰️ Pacing / Episode Flow

This one is brisk at about 30 minutes, but it somehow feels longer — not in a good way. There’s a strong opening setup (ancient stone, workmen disturbing something), followed by 20+ minutes of slow bleeding and panicked phone calls.

It’s less “ooh, eerie British ghost story” and more “what if Poltergeist had a nosebleed fetish and zero ghosts?”




✅ Pros

🌄 The countryside visuals and stone circle give folk horror potential.

🩸 Some of the bleeding imagery is eerie — especially when it becomes excessive.

🎭 The actress playing Katherine really commits to the psychological spiral.

🪦 The idea of ancient curses and blood rites is interesting in theory.





❌ Cons

🤷‍♂️ The story never fully explains anything. It’s vague in a lazy way, not a creepy way.

❌ There’s no ghost — just blood. Blood as metaphor? Maybe. But it’s still unsatisfying.

💤 The atmosphere never matches the dread of earlier entries like Lost Hearts or A Warning to the Curious.

😕 For a “Ghost Story for Christmas,” it’s barely spooky and certainly not festive.

👎 The ending is abrupt, depressing, and doesn’t justify the buildup.





🧾 Final Thoughts

Look… this ain’t it.

Stigma has the bones of a folk horror tale and the legacy of a beloved seasonal anthology behind it, but it does nothing with either. It’s the odd duck of the Ghost Story for Christmas lineup — modern setting, no clear antagonist, vague metaphor, and no payoff.

If you’re doing a full marathon of these BBC ghost stories, it’s worth watching for completion’s sake only. But if you’re expecting the dread of The Signalman or the gothic creep of Lost Hearts — skip this one.




⭐ Rating: 5/10 💧😶‍🌫️🪦




🚨 Spoiler Warning 🚨

You might want to shield your eyes for this one… literally.




💀 Spoilers

So what is the curse?

Katherine begins bleeding internally with no source. It’s implied that disturbing the ancient stones unleashed a pagan curse, one meant to punish those who desecrate sacred land. The blood is a symbolic sacrifice — Katherine unknowingly becomes the vessel.

But the horror never escalates beyond weird, unexplained internal bleeding. She bleeds in the shower. On the stairs. Her clothes are stained. It’s more medical mystery than ghost story.

Then she collapses. She doesn’t wake up and  911 is called and she’s taken away. She dies. That’s it. The film ends with her son watching in silence while the men continue working outside, oblivious.

It’s grim. It’s strange. And it never earns the “scare.”

Leave a comment